Jurris.COM
Article 10. Accreditation In Educator Preparation of California Education Code >> Division 3. >> Title 2. >> Part 25. >> Chapter 2. >> Article 10.
The Legislature finds and declares that the competence and
performance of professional educators depends in part on the quality
of their academic and professional preparation. The Legislature
recognizes that standards of quality in collegiate preparation
complement standards of candidate competence and performance, and
that general standards and criteria regarding the overall quality of
a candidate's preparation are as essential as the assessment of the
candidate's competence and performance.
(a) The system for accreditation of educator preparation
shall do all of the following:
(1) Concentrate on the overall quality of educator preparation in credential programs.
(2) Hold professional elementary, secondary, and postsecondary educators responsible for quality in the preparation of professional practitioners.
(3) Contribute to improvements in educator preparation and recognize excellence in preparation programs and institutions.
(4) Be governed by an accreditation framework that sets forth the policies of the commission regarding the accreditation of educator preparation.
(b) The accreditation framework shall do all of the following:
(1) Establish broad, flexible policies and standards for accreditation of educator preparation.
(2) Define the accreditation responsibilities, authority, and roles of the commission and the Committee on Accreditation.
(3) Establish an accreditation system that is efficient and cost effective.
(4) Require that accreditation decisions be based on sufficient, reliable evidence about the quality of educator preparation.
(1) Concentrate on the overall quality of educator preparation in credential programs.
(2) Hold professional elementary, secondary, and postsecondary educators responsible for quality in the preparation of professional practitioners.
(3) Contribute to improvements in educator preparation and recognize excellence in preparation programs and institutions.
(4) Be governed by an accreditation framework that sets forth the policies of the commission regarding the accreditation of educator preparation.
(b) The accreditation framework shall do all of the following:
(1) Establish broad, flexible policies and standards for accreditation of educator preparation.
(2) Define the accreditation responsibilities, authority, and roles of the commission and the Committee on Accreditation.
(3) Establish an accreditation system that is efficient and cost effective.
(4) Require that accreditation decisions be based on sufficient, reliable evidence about the quality of educator preparation.
The powers and duties of the commission regarding the
accreditation system shall include the following:
(a) Adopt and implement an accreditation framework, which sets forth the policies of the commission regarding the accreditation of educator preparation in California.
(b) Establish and modify credential-specific standards, experimental program standards, and alternative program standards, as defined in the adopted accreditation framework.
(c) Rule on the eligibility of an applicant for accreditation when the applying institution has not previously prepared educators for state certification in California, pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 44227.
(d) Appoint and reappoint the members of the Committee on Accreditation, in accordance with Section 44373, by selecting among nominees submitted by a panel of distinguished educators.
(e) Review periodic accreditation reports by the Committee on Accreditation, and refer accreditation issues and concerns to the committee for its examination and response.
(f) Hear and resolve appeals of accreditation decisions, pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 44374.
(g) Allocate resources annually for implementation of the accreditation system.
(h) With the Committee on Accreditation, jointly design an evaluation of accreditation policies and their implementation.
(i) Inform and advise the Legislature regarding statutory issues related to accreditation, and submit legislative recommendations, after considering the advice of the Committee on Accreditation, educational institutions, and professional organizations.
(a) Adopt and implement an accreditation framework, which sets forth the policies of the commission regarding the accreditation of educator preparation in California.
(b) Establish and modify credential-specific standards, experimental program standards, and alternative program standards, as defined in the adopted accreditation framework.
(c) Rule on the eligibility of an applicant for accreditation when the applying institution has not previously prepared educators for state certification in California, pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 44227.
(d) Appoint and reappoint the members of the Committee on Accreditation, in accordance with Section 44373, by selecting among nominees submitted by a panel of distinguished educators.
(e) Review periodic accreditation reports by the Committee on Accreditation, and refer accreditation issues and concerns to the committee for its examination and response.
(f) Hear and resolve appeals of accreditation decisions, pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 44374.
(g) Allocate resources annually for implementation of the accreditation system.
(h) With the Committee on Accreditation, jointly design an evaluation of accreditation policies and their implementation.
(i) Inform and advise the Legislature regarding statutory issues related to accreditation, and submit legislative recommendations, after considering the advice of the Committee on Accreditation, educational institutions, and professional organizations.
(a) There is hereby established the Committee on
Accreditation consisting of 12 members selected for their
distinguished records of accomplishment in education. Six members
shall be from postsecondary education institutions, and six shall be
certificated professionals in public schools, school districts, or
county offices of education in California. No member shall serve on
the committee as a representative of any organization or institution.
Membership shall be, to the maximum extent possible, balanced in
terms of ethnicity, gender, and geographic regions. The committee
shall include members from elementary and secondary schools, and
members from public and private institutions of postsecondary
education.
(b) The terms of committee members shall be in accordance with the accreditation framework. Appointment of the initial committee members shall be from nominees submitted by a panel of distinguished educators, who are named by a consensus of the commission and the accreditation advisory council, pursuant to Section 44371, as that section read on December 31, 1993. Appointment of subsequent committee members shall be from nominees submitted by a distinguished panel named by a consensus of the commission and the Committee on Accreditation. For each committee position to be filled by the commission, the panel shall submit two highly qualified nominees.
(c) The committee shall do, but shall not be limited to doing, all of the following:
(1) Make decisions about the accreditation of educator preparation. The committee's decisionmaking process shall be in accordance with the accreditation framework.
(2) Make decisions about the initial accreditation of new programs of educator preparation in accordance with procedures established by the committee.
(3) Determine the comparability of standards submitted by applicants with those adopted by the commission, in accordance with the accreditation framework.
(4) Adopt guidelines for accreditation reviews, and monitor the performance of accreditation teams and other aspects of the accreditation system.
(5) Present an annual accreditation report to the commission and respond to accreditation issues and concerns referred to the committee by the commission.
(b) The terms of committee members shall be in accordance with the accreditation framework. Appointment of the initial committee members shall be from nominees submitted by a panel of distinguished educators, who are named by a consensus of the commission and the accreditation advisory council, pursuant to Section 44371, as that section read on December 31, 1993. Appointment of subsequent committee members shall be from nominees submitted by a distinguished panel named by a consensus of the commission and the Committee on Accreditation. For each committee position to be filled by the commission, the panel shall submit two highly qualified nominees.
(c) The committee shall do, but shall not be limited to doing, all of the following:
(1) Make decisions about the accreditation of educator preparation. The committee's decisionmaking process shall be in accordance with the accreditation framework.
(2) Make decisions about the initial accreditation of new programs of educator preparation in accordance with procedures established by the committee.
(3) Determine the comparability of standards submitted by applicants with those adopted by the commission, in accordance with the accreditation framework.
(4) Adopt guidelines for accreditation reviews, and monitor the performance of accreditation teams and other aspects of the accreditation system.
(5) Present an annual accreditation report to the commission and respond to accreditation issues and concerns referred to the committee by the commission.
(a) The accreditation framework shall include common
standards that relate to aspects of program quality that are the same
for all credential programs. The framework shall also include
multiple options for program standards.
(b) The accreditation framework shall include provisions regarding well-trained accreditation teams whose members shall be drawn from a pool of California college and university faculty members and administrators, elementary and secondary school teachers and other certificated professionals, and local school board members. For each accreditation visit there shall be one team, whose size, composition, and expertise shall be constituted according to the accreditation framework.
(c) An accreditation team shall present its report and recommendations to the Committee on Accreditation in accordance with the accreditation framework. The committee shall consider the accreditation team report and recommendations, and shall also consider evidence, which may be submitted by the institution, that the team demonstrated bias or acted arbitrarily or capriciously or contrary to the policies of the accreditation framework or the procedural guidelines of the committee.
(d) The Committee on Accreditation shall make a single decision to accredit, to accredit with stipulations, or to deny accreditation to an institution's credential programs, pursuant to Section 44373 and the accreditation framework.
(e) An institution has the right to appeal to the commission if the procedures or decisions of an accreditation team or the Committee on Accreditation are arbitrary, capricious, unfair, or contrary to the policies of the commission or the procedural guidelines of the committee. An institution also has the right to recommend changes in the accreditation policies of the commission, which shall be considered by the commission in consultation with the executive director and the Committee on Accreditation.
(f) At the request of an institution, the accreditation of an education unit or a specific program by a national accrediting body shall substitute for state accreditation provided that the national accrediting body has satisfied the applicable conditions set forth in the accreditation framework.
(b) The accreditation framework shall include provisions regarding well-trained accreditation teams whose members shall be drawn from a pool of California college and university faculty members and administrators, elementary and secondary school teachers and other certificated professionals, and local school board members. For each accreditation visit there shall be one team, whose size, composition, and expertise shall be constituted according to the accreditation framework.
(c) An accreditation team shall present its report and recommendations to the Committee on Accreditation in accordance with the accreditation framework. The committee shall consider the accreditation team report and recommendations, and shall also consider evidence, which may be submitted by the institution, that the team demonstrated bias or acted arbitrarily or capriciously or contrary to the policies of the accreditation framework or the procedural guidelines of the committee.
(d) The Committee on Accreditation shall make a single decision to accredit, to accredit with stipulations, or to deny accreditation to an institution's credential programs, pursuant to Section 44373 and the accreditation framework.
(e) An institution has the right to appeal to the commission if the procedures or decisions of an accreditation team or the Committee on Accreditation are arbitrary, capricious, unfair, or contrary to the policies of the commission or the procedural guidelines of the committee. An institution also has the right to recommend changes in the accreditation policies of the commission, which shall be considered by the commission in consultation with the executive director and the Committee on Accreditation.
(f) At the request of an institution, the accreditation of an education unit or a specific program by a national accrediting body shall substitute for state accreditation provided that the national accrediting body has satisfied the applicable conditions set forth in the accreditation framework.
(a) The commission may charge fees to cover the standard
costs of reviewing new and existing educator preparation programs.
Sponsors of educator preparation programs shall submit the
established fee to the commission when submitting a proposal for a
new program, and, as determined by the commission, for the review of
an existing program. The commission shall not waive the fee for the
review of existing programs for in-kind contributions from sponsors
of educator preparation programs. The commission may review the
established fees on a periodic basis and adjust the fees as
necessary. The commission shall notify the chairpersons of the
committees and subcommittees in each house of the Legislature that
consider the State Budget and the Department of Finance at least 30
days before implementing the fees and at least 30 days before making
any subsequent fee adjustments.
(b) The commission may charge commission-approved entities a fee to recover the costs of accreditation activities in excess of the regularly scheduled data reports, program assessments, and accreditation site visits. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, accreditation revisits, addressing stipulations, or program assessment reviews beyond those supported within the standard costs of review. Sponsors of educator preparation programs shall submit the established fee to the commission in the year that the extraordinary activities are performed. The commission may review the established fee on a periodic basis, and adjust the fee as necessary. The commission shall notify the chairpersons of the committees and subcommittees in each house of the Legislature that consider the State Budget and the Department of Finance at least 30 days before implementing the fee and at least 30 days before making any subsequent fee adjustments.
(b) The commission may charge commission-approved entities a fee to recover the costs of accreditation activities in excess of the regularly scheduled data reports, program assessments, and accreditation site visits. This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, accreditation revisits, addressing stipulations, or program assessment reviews beyond those supported within the standard costs of review. Sponsors of educator preparation programs shall submit the established fee to the commission in the year that the extraordinary activities are performed. The commission may review the established fee on a periodic basis, and adjust the fee as necessary. The commission shall notify the chairpersons of the committees and subcommittees in each house of the Legislature that consider the State Budget and the Department of Finance at least 30 days before implementing the fee and at least 30 days before making any subsequent fee adjustments.
