Section 1061 Of Article 11. Trade Secret From California Evidence Code >> Division 8. >> Chapter 4. >> Article 11.
1061
. (a) For purposes of this section, and Sections 1062 and 1063:
(1) "Trade secret" means "trade secret," as defined in subdivision
(d) of Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code, or paragraph (9) of
subdivision (a) of Section 499c of the Penal Code.
(2) "Article" means "article," as defined in paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 499c of the Penal Code.
(b) In addition to Section 1062, the following procedure shall
apply whenever the owner of a trade secret wishes to assert his or
her trade secret privilege, as provided in Section 1060, during a
criminal proceeding:
(1) The owner of the trade secret shall file a motion for a
protective order, or the people may file the motion on the owner's
behalf and with the owner's permission. The motion shall include an
affidavit based upon personal knowledge listing the affiant's
qualifications to give an opinion concerning the trade secret at
issue, identifying, without revealing, the alleged trade secret and
articles which disclose the secret, and presenting evidence that the
secret qualifies as a trade secret under either subdivision (d) of
Section 3426.1 of the Civil Code or paragraph (9) of subdivision (a)
of Section 499c of the Penal Code. The motion and affidavit shall be
served on all parties in the proceeding.
(2) Any party in the proceeding may oppose the request for the
protective order by submitting affidavits based upon the affiant's
personal knowledge. The affidavits shall be filed under seal, but
shall be provided to the owner of the trade secret and to all parties
in the proceeding. Neither the owner of the trade secret nor any
party in the proceeding may disclose the affidavit to persons other
than to counsel of record without prior court approval.
(3) The movant shall, by a preponderance of the evidence, show
that the issuance of a protective order is proper. The court may rule
on the request without holding an evidentiary hearing. However, in
its discretion, the court may choose to hold an in camera evidentiary
hearing concerning disputed articles with only the owner of the
trade secret, the people's representative, the defendant, and
defendant's counsel present. If the court holds such a hearing, the
parties' right to examine witnesses shall not be used to obtain
discovery, but shall be directed solely toward the question of
whether the alleged trade secret qualifies for protection.
(4) If the court finds that a trade secret may be disclosed during
any criminal proceeding unless a protective order is issued and that
the issuance of a protective order would not conceal a fraud or work
an injustice, the court shall issue a protective order limiting the
use and dissemination of the trade secret, including, but not limited
to, articles disclosing that secret. The protective order may, in
the court's discretion, include the following provisions:
(A) That the trade secret may be disseminated only to counsel for
the parties, including their associate attorneys, paralegals, and
investigators, and to law enforcement officials or clerical
officials.
(B) That the defendant may view the secret only in the presence of
his or her counsel, or if not in the presence of his or her counsel,
at counsel's offices.
(C) That any party seeking to show the trade secret, or articles
containing the trade secret, to any person not designated by the
protective order shall first obtain court approval to do so:
(i) The court may require that the person receiving the trade
secret do so only in the presence of counsel for the party requesting
approval.
(ii) The court may require the person receiving the trade secret
to sign a copy of the protective order and to agree to be bound by
its terms. The order may include a provision recognizing the owner of
the trade secret to be a third-party beneficiary of that agreement.
(iii) The court may require a party seeking disclosure to an
expert to provide that expert's name, employment history, and any
other relevant information to the court for examination. The court
shall accept that information under seal, and the information shall
not be disclosed by any court except upon termination of the action
and upon a showing of good cause to believe the secret has been
disseminated by a court-approved expert. The court shall evaluate the
expert and determine whether the expert poses a discernible risk of
disclosure. The court shall withhold approval if the expert's
economic interests place the expert in a competitive position with
the victim, unless no other experts are available. The court may
interview the expert in camera in aid of its ruling. If the court
rejects the expert, it shall state its reasons for doing so on the
record and a transcript of those reasons shall be prepared and
sealed.
(D) That no articles disclosing the trade secret shall be filed or
otherwise made a part of the court record available to the public
without approval of the court and prior notice to the owner of the
secret. The owner of the secret may give either party permission to
accept the notice on the owner's behalf.
(E) Other orders as the court deems necessary to protect the
integrity of the trade secret.
(c) A ruling granting or denying a motion for a protective order
filed pursuant to subdivision (b) shall not be construed as a
determination that the alleged trade secret is or is not a trade
secret as defined by subdivision (d) of Section 3426.1 of the Civil
Code or paragraph (9) of subdivision (a) of Section 499c of the Penal
Code. Such a ruling shall not have any effect on any civil
litigation.
(d) This section shall have prospective effect only and shall not
operate to invalidate previously entered protective orders.