Jurris.COM

Article 22. Inspection And Abatement of California Food And Agricultural Code >> Division 21. >> Part 2. >> Chapter 1. >> Article 22.

This article applies to any lot of any commodity which is regulated by a marketing order or marketing agreement wherever, or in whose possession, such lot may be in the marketing channels within this state.
Any authorized inspector, or other authorized person, who is discharging his duties in the checking of compliance with the provisions of any marketing order which is made effective pursuant to this chapter may enter and inspect any premises, enclosure, building, or conveyance where he has reason to believe any commodity which is subject to a marketing order is produced, stored, being prepared for market, or marketed, and inspect, or cause to be inspected, such representative samples of the commodity as may be necessary to determine whether or not any lot of such commodity is in compliance with applicable regulations, or rules and regulations, of any marketing order which is made effective pursuant to any provision of this chapter.
Except as otherwise provided in this article, any authorized inspector, or other authorized person, in the discharge of his duties, if he has reason to believe that a lot of any commodity subject to a marketing order or marketing agreement which is issued pursuant to this chapter is not in compliance with the requirements of such marketing order or agreement, or of marketing regulations, or rules and regulations, which are issued pursuant to it, as to quality, condition, size, maturity, pack, labeling, or markings, may hold such lot for a reasonable period of time sufficient to enable such officer to ascertain by an authorized inspection whether such lot complies with such marketing requirements, but in any event not to exceed 24 hours in the case of perishables, or 72 hours in the case of nonperishables.
Following inspection, such inspector or other authorized person may affix to any lot which is determined to be in noncompliance, an official notice, warning tag, or other appropriate marking which warns that the lot is held and states the reasons why it is held. It is unlawful for any person, except an authorized inspector or enforcing officer, to detach, alter, deface, or destroy any such official notice, warning tag, or marking so affixed to any such lot, or to remove or dispose of such lot in any manner or under conditions other than as prescribed in such notice of noncompliance except upon written permission of an authorized enforcing officer or by order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
The director, or the authorized person by whom such lot is being held, shall serve the person in possession of the lot with a notice of noncompliance. Such notice shall be served in person or by mail to the last known address of such person that is in possession. The person in possession shall notify the owner of the lot, or every other person that has an interest in it, of the serving of such notice of noncompliance.
The notice of noncompliance shall include all of the following:
  (a) A description of the lot.
  (b) The place where, and the reasons for which, the lot is held.
  (c) A citation of the applicable marketing order or agreement or marketing regulation, or rule and regulation, and any section of it upon which the notice of noncompliance is based.
The owner of the lot shall have, in the case of a perishable commodity not to exceed 48 hours, and in the case of a nonperishable commodity not to exceed 72 hours, from the time of serving such notice of noncompliance for reconditioning or for the correction of the deficiencies which are noted in the notice of noncompliance. If such lot is reconditioned or the deficiencies are corrected the enforcing officer shall remove the warning tags or markings and release the lot for marketing or may, with the consent of the owner of such lot, divert the lot to other lawful uses or destroy it.
If the owner of the lot fails or refuses to give such consent, or if the lot has not been reconditioned or the deficiencies otherwise corrected so as to bring it into compliance within the time which is specified in the notice, the enforcing officer shall proceed as provided in Section 59289.
(a) The enforcing officer may file a verified petition in superior court requesting permission to divert the lot to any other available lawful use or to destroy the lot. The verified petition shall show all of the following:
  (1) The condition of the lot.
  (2) That the lot is situated within the territorial jurisdiction of the court in which the petition is being filed.
  (3) That the lot is held, and that the notice of noncompliance has been served as provided in Section 59285.
  (4) That the lot has not been reconditioned as required.
  (5) The name and address of the owner and the person in possession of the lot.
  (6) That the owner has refused permission to divert or to destroy the lot.
  (b) A proceeding under this section is a limited civil case if the value of the property in controversy is less than or equal to the maximum amount in controversy for a limited civil case under Section 85 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Upon the filing of the verified petition, the court may issue an order to show cause returnable in five days after service upon the owner why the lot shall not be reconditioned or the deficiencies corrected, or why the lot shall not be diverted to other lawful uses or destroyed. The owner of the lot may, prior to the date when the order to show cause is returnable, either recondition or correct the deficiencies in the lot so as to bring it into compliance, or may file at or before the hearing on the order an answer with the court stating why the lot should not be reconditioned or the deficiencies corrected so as to bring it into compliance, or showing why it should not be diverted to other lawful uses or destroyed.
If at the expiration of the five-day period the owner of the lot has failed or refused to recondition or to correct the deficiencies so as to bring the lot into compliance, the court may enter judgment ordering that the lot be reconditioned, diverted to any other lawful use, destroyed in the manner which is directed by the court, relabeled, denatured or otherwise processed, sold, or released upon such conditions as the court in its discretion may impose. The lot may not, however, be sold or released into the regular channels of trade.
In the event of sale of any lot by order of court, the costs of storage, handling, and reconditioning or disposal shall be deducted from the proceeds of sale and the balance, if any, paid into court for the account of the owner of any such lot.
Disposal of any lot or portion of any lot pursuant to the provisions of this article, whether such disposal be by arrangement with an enforcement officer or by court order, does not waive any of the penalty provisions of this chapter.