Jurris.COM
Article 7. Authority And Responsibility of California Government Code >> Title 8. >> Chapter 5.7. >> Article 7.
The Judicial Council, as the policymaking body for the
judicial branch, shall have the following responsibilities and
authorities with regard to court facilities, in addition to any other
responsibilities or authorities established by law:
(a) Exercise full responsibility, jurisdiction, control, and authority as an owner would have over trial court facilities the title of which is held by the state, including, but not limited to, the acquisition and development of facilities.
(b) Exercise the full range of policymaking authority over trial court facilities, including, but not limited to, planning, construction, acquisition, and operation, to the extent not expressly otherwise limited by law.
(c) Dispose of surplus court facilities following the transfer of responsibility under Article 3 (commencing with Section 70321), subject to all of the following:
(1) If the property was a court facility previously the responsibility of the county, the Judicial Council shall comply with the requirements of Section 11011, and as follows, except that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the proportion of the net proceeds that represents the proportion of other state funds used on the property other than for operation and maintenance shall be returned to the fund from which it came and the remainder of the proceeds shall be deposited in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(2) The Judicial Council shall consult with the county concerning the disposition of the facility. Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 11011, when requested by the transferring county, a surplus facility shall be offered to that county at fair market value prior to being offered to another state agency or local government agency.
(3) The Judicial Council shall consider whether the potential new or planned use of the facility:
(A) Is compatible with the use of other adjacent public buildings.
(B) Unreasonably departs from the historic or local character of the surrounding property or local community.
(C) Has a negative impact on the local community.
(D) Unreasonably interferes with other governmental agencies that use or are located in or adjacent to the building containing the court facility.
(E) Is of sufficient benefit to outweigh the public good in maintaining it as a court facility or building.
(4) All funds received for disposal of surplus court facilities shall be deposited by the Judicial Council in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(5) If the facility was acquired, rehabilitated, or constructed, in whole or in part, with moneys in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund that were deposited in that fund from the state fund, any funds received for disposal of that facility shall be apportioned to the state fund and the State Court Facilities Construction Fund in the same proportion that the original cost of the building was paid from the state fund and other sources of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(6) Submission of a plan to the Legislature for the disposition of court facilities transferred to the state, prior to, or as part of, any budget submission to fund a new courthouse that will replace the existing court facilities transferred to the state.
(d) Conduct audits of all of the following:
(1) The collection of fees by the local courts.
(2) The moneys in local courthouse construction funds established pursuant to Section 76100.
(3) The collection of moneys to be transmitted to the Controller for deposit in the Immediate and Critical Needs Account of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund, established in Section 70371.5.
(e) Establish policies, procedures, and guidelines for ensuring that the courts have adequate and sufficient facilities, including, but not limited to, facilities planning, acquisition, construction, design, operation, and maintenance.
(f) Establish and consult with local project advisory groups on the construction of new trial court facilities, including the trial court, the county, the local sheriff, state agencies, bar groups, including, but not limited to, the criminal defense bar, and members of the community. Consultation with the local sheriff in design, planning, and construction shall include the physical layout of new facilities, as it relates to court security and other security considerations, including matters relating to the safe control and transport of in-custody defendants.
(g) Manage court facilities in consultation with the trial courts.
(h) Allocate appropriated funds for court facilities maintenance and construction, subject to the other provisions of this chapter.
(i) Manage shared-use facilities to the extent required by the agreement under Section 70343.
(j) Prepare funding requests for court facility construction, repair, and maintenance.
(k) Implement the design, bid, award, and construction of all court construction projects, except as delegated to others.
(l) Provide for capital outlay projects that may be built with funds appropriated or otherwise available for these purposes as follows:
(1) Approve five-year and master plans for each district.
(2) Establish priorities for construction.
(3) Recommend to the Governor and the Legislature the projects to be funded by the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(4) Submit the cost of projects proposed to be funded to the Department of Finance for inclusion in the Governor's Budget.
(m) In carrying out its responsibilities and authority under this section, the Judicial Council shall consult with the local court for:
(1) Selecting and contracting with facility consultants.
(2) Preparing and reviewing architectural programs and designs for court facilities.
(3) Preparing strategic master and five-year capital facilities plans.
(4) Major maintenance of a facility.
(a) Exercise full responsibility, jurisdiction, control, and authority as an owner would have over trial court facilities the title of which is held by the state, including, but not limited to, the acquisition and development of facilities.
(b) Exercise the full range of policymaking authority over trial court facilities, including, but not limited to, planning, construction, acquisition, and operation, to the extent not expressly otherwise limited by law.
(c) Dispose of surplus court facilities following the transfer of responsibility under Article 3 (commencing with Section 70321), subject to all of the following:
(1) If the property was a court facility previously the responsibility of the county, the Judicial Council shall comply with the requirements of Section 11011, and as follows, except that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the proportion of the net proceeds that represents the proportion of other state funds used on the property other than for operation and maintenance shall be returned to the fund from which it came and the remainder of the proceeds shall be deposited in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(2) The Judicial Council shall consult with the county concerning the disposition of the facility. Notwithstanding any other law, including Section 11011, when requested by the transferring county, a surplus facility shall be offered to that county at fair market value prior to being offered to another state agency or local government agency.
(3) The Judicial Council shall consider whether the potential new or planned use of the facility:
(A) Is compatible with the use of other adjacent public buildings.
(B) Unreasonably departs from the historic or local character of the surrounding property or local community.
(C) Has a negative impact on the local community.
(D) Unreasonably interferes with other governmental agencies that use or are located in or adjacent to the building containing the court facility.
(E) Is of sufficient benefit to outweigh the public good in maintaining it as a court facility or building.
(4) All funds received for disposal of surplus court facilities shall be deposited by the Judicial Council in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(5) If the facility was acquired, rehabilitated, or constructed, in whole or in part, with moneys in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund that were deposited in that fund from the state fund, any funds received for disposal of that facility shall be apportioned to the state fund and the State Court Facilities Construction Fund in the same proportion that the original cost of the building was paid from the state fund and other sources of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(6) Submission of a plan to the Legislature for the disposition of court facilities transferred to the state, prior to, or as part of, any budget submission to fund a new courthouse that will replace the existing court facilities transferred to the state.
(d) Conduct audits of all of the following:
(1) The collection of fees by the local courts.
(2) The moneys in local courthouse construction funds established pursuant to Section 76100.
(3) The collection of moneys to be transmitted to the Controller for deposit in the Immediate and Critical Needs Account of the State Court Facilities Construction Fund, established in Section 70371.5.
(e) Establish policies, procedures, and guidelines for ensuring that the courts have adequate and sufficient facilities, including, but not limited to, facilities planning, acquisition, construction, design, operation, and maintenance.
(f) Establish and consult with local project advisory groups on the construction of new trial court facilities, including the trial court, the county, the local sheriff, state agencies, bar groups, including, but not limited to, the criminal defense bar, and members of the community. Consultation with the local sheriff in design, planning, and construction shall include the physical layout of new facilities, as it relates to court security and other security considerations, including matters relating to the safe control and transport of in-custody defendants.
(g) Manage court facilities in consultation with the trial courts.
(h) Allocate appropriated funds for court facilities maintenance and construction, subject to the other provisions of this chapter.
(i) Manage shared-use facilities to the extent required by the agreement under Section 70343.
(j) Prepare funding requests for court facility construction, repair, and maintenance.
(k) Implement the design, bid, award, and construction of all court construction projects, except as delegated to others.
(l) Provide for capital outlay projects that may be built with funds appropriated or otherwise available for these purposes as follows:
(1) Approve five-year and master plans for each district.
(2) Establish priorities for construction.
(3) Recommend to the Governor and the Legislature the projects to be funded by the State Court Facilities Construction Fund.
(4) Submit the cost of projects proposed to be funded to the Department of Finance for inclusion in the Governor's Budget.
(m) In carrying out its responsibilities and authority under this section, the Judicial Council shall consult with the local court for:
(1) Selecting and contracting with facility consultants.
(2) Preparing and reviewing architectural programs and designs for court facilities.
(3) Preparing strategic master and five-year capital facilities plans.
(4) Major maintenance of a facility.
(a) The Judicial Council shall develop performance
expectations for court facility proposals, including benchmark
criteria for total project life-cycle costs, project cost comparisons
to traditional delivery and financing options, project risk
assessments and allocations, utility and energy conservation
requirements that meet or exceed state standards, and court security
operations cost controls and reduction goals. The performance
expectations and benchmark criteria shall be consistent with Chapter
1016 of the Statutes of 2002, Chapter 488 of the Statutes of 2006,
and consistent with all current state building practices.
(b) In reviewing any court facility proposal that includes a public-private partnership component, the Director of Finance shall take into consideration any terms in the proposal that could create long-term funding commitments and how those terms may be structured to minimize risk to the state's credit ratings. Following the approval of any court facility proposal of the Director of Finance, the Judicial Council shall notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee of the performance expectations and benchmark criteria for the proposal at least 30 days prior to the release of initial solicitation documents for a court facility project. If the Joint Legislative Budget Committee does not express any opposition or concerns, the Judicial Council may proceed with the solicitation 30 days after giving that notice.
(b) In reviewing any court facility proposal that includes a public-private partnership component, the Director of Finance shall take into consideration any terms in the proposal that could create long-term funding commitments and how those terms may be structured to minimize risk to the state's credit ratings. Following the approval of any court facility proposal of the Director of Finance, the Judicial Council shall notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee of the performance expectations and benchmark criteria for the proposal at least 30 days prior to the release of initial solicitation documents for a court facility project. If the Joint Legislative Budget Committee does not express any opposition or concerns, the Judicial Council may proceed with the solicitation 30 days after giving that notice.
(a) For purposes of this section, the definitions in
subdivision (a) of Section 13332.19 shall apply. For purposes of
subdivision (a) of Section 13332.19, references to the Department of
General Services shall be deemed to be references to the Judicial
Council.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of the Public Contract Code or any other law, when the Legislature appropriates funds for a specific project, the Judicial Council may contract and procure court facilities pursuant to this section.
(c) Prior to contracting with a design-build entity for the procurement of a court facility under this section, the Judicial Council shall:
(1) Prepare a program setting forth the performance criteria for the design-build project. The performance criteria shall be prepared by a design professional duly licensed and registered in the State of California.
(2) (A) Establish a competitive prequalification and selection process for design-build entities, including any subcontractors listed at the time of bid, that clearly specifies the prequalification criteria, and states the manner in which the winning design-build entity will be selected.
(B) Prequalification shall be limited to consideration of all of the following criteria:
(i) Possession of all required licenses, registration, and credentials in good standing that are required to design and construct the project.
(ii) Submission of evidence that establishes that the design-build entity members have completed, or demonstrated the capability to complete, projects of similar size, scope, or complexity, and that proposed key personnel have sufficient experience and training to competently manage and complete the design and construction of the project.
(iii) Submission of a proposed project management plan that establishes that the design-build entity has the experience, competence, and capacity needed to effectively complete the project.
(iv) Submission of evidence that establishes that the design-build entity has the capacity to obtain all required payment and performance bonding, liability insurance, and errors and omissions insurance, as well as a financial statement that assures the Judicial Council that the design-build entity has the capacity to complete the project.
(v) Provision of a declaration certifying that applying members of the design-build entity have not had a surety company finish work on any project within the last five years.
(vi) Provision of information and a declaration providing detail concerning all of the following:
(I) Any construction or design claim or litigation totaling more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or 5 percent of the annual value of work performed, whichever is less, settled against any member of the design-build entity over the last five years.
(II) Serious violations of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973, as provided in Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code, settled against any member of the design-build entity.
(III) Violations of federal or state law, including, but not limited to, those laws governing the payment of wages, benefits, or personal income tax withholding, or of Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) withholding requirements, state disability insurance withholding, or unemployment insurance payment requirements, settled against any member of the design-build entity over the last five years. For purposes of this subclause, only violations by a design-build member as an employer shall be deemed applicable, unless it is shown that the design-build entity member, in his or her capacity as an employer, had knowledge of his or her subcontractor's violations or failed to comply with the conditions set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 1775 of the Labor Code.
(IV) Information required by Section 10162 of the Public Contract Code.
(V) Violations of the Contractors' State License Law (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), excluding alleged violations or complaints.
(VI) Any conviction of any member of the design-build entity of submitting a false or fraudulent claim to a public agency over the last five years.
(vii) Provision of a declaration that the design-build entity will comply with all other provisions of law applicable to the project, including, but not limited to, the requirements of Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code.
(C) The Judicial Council, when requested by the design-build entity, shall hold in confidence any information required by clauses (i) to (vi), inclusive, of subparagraph (B).
(D) Any declaration required under subparagraph (B) shall state that reasonable diligence has been used in its preparation and that it is true and complete to the best of the signer's knowledge. A person who certifies as true any material matter that he or she knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by not more than one year in a county jail, by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment.
(3) (A) Determine, as the Judicial Council deems in the best interests of the state, which of the following methods listed in subparagraph (B) will be used as the process for the winning design-build entity. The Judicial Council shall provide a notification to the State Public Works Board, regarding the method selected for determining the winning design-build entity, at least 30 days prior to publicizing the design-build solicitation package.
(B) The Judicial Council shall make its determination by choosing one of the following methods:
(i) A design-build competition based upon performance, price, and other criteria set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. The Judicial Council shall establish technical criteria and methodology, including price, to evaluate proposals and shall describe the criteria and methodology in the design-build solicitation package. Award shall be made to the design-build entity whose proposal is judged as providing the best value in meeting the interests of the Judicial Council and meeting the objectives of the project. A project with an approved budget of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more may be awarded pursuant to this clause.
(ii) A design-build competition based upon performance and other criteria set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. Criteria used in this evaluation of proposals may include, but need not be limited to, items such as proposed design approach, life-cycle costs, project features, and functions. However, any criteria and methods used to evaluate proposals shall be limited to those contained in the design-build solicitation package. Award shall be made to the design-build entity whose proposal is judged as providing the best value, for the lowest price, meeting the interests of the Judicial Council and meeting the objectives of the project. A project with an approved budget of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more may be awarded pursuant to this clause.
(iii) A design-build competition based upon program requirements and a detailed scope of work, including any performance criteria and concept drawings set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. Award shall be made on the basis of the lowest responsible bid. A project with an approved budget of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) or more may be awarded pursuant to this clause.
(4) For purposes of this subdivision, the following definitions shall apply:
(A) "Best interest of the state" means a design-build process that is projected by the Judicial Council to reduce the project delivery schedule and total cost of a project while maintaining a high level of quality workmanship and materials, when compared to the traditional design-bid-build process.
(B) "Best value" means a value determined by objective criteria that may include, but are not limited to, price, features, functions, life-cycle costs, experience, and other criteria deemed appropriate by the Judicial Council.
(d) The Legislature recognizes that the design-build entity is charged with performing both design and construction. Because a design-build contract may be awarded prior to the completion of the design, it is often impracticable for the design-build entity to list all subcontractors at the time of the award. As a result, the subcontractor listing requirements contained in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 4100) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code can create a conflict with the implementation of the design-build process by requiring all subcontractors to be listed at a time when a sufficient set of plans may not be available. It is the intent of the Legislature to establish a clear process for the selection and award of subcontracts entered into pursuant to this section in a manner that retains protection for subcontractors while enabling design-build projects to be administered in an efficient fashion. Therefore, all of the following requirements shall apply to subcontractors, licensed pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, that are employed on design-build projects undertaken pursuant to this section:
(1) The Judicial Council, in each design-build solicitation package, may identify types of subcontractors, by subcontractor license classification, that will be listed by the design-build entity at the time of the bid. In selecting the subcontractors that will be listed by the design-build entity, the Judicial Council shall limit the identification to only those license classifications deemed essential for proper completion of the project. In no event, however, may the Judicial Council specify more than five licensed subcontractor classifications. In addition, at its discretion, the design-build entity may list an additional two subcontractors, identified by subcontractor license classification, that will perform design or construction work, or both, on the project. In no event shall the design-build entity list at the time of bid a total number of subcontractors that will perform design or construction work, or both, in a total of more than seven subcontractor license classifications on a project. All subcontractors that are listed at the time of bid shall be afforded all of the protection contained in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 4100) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code. All subcontracts that were not listed by the design-build entity at the time of bid shall be awarded in accordance with paragraph (2).
(2) All subcontracts that were not to be performed by the design-build entity in accordance with paragraph (1) shall be competitively bid and awarded by the design-build entity, in accordance with the design-build process set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. The design-build entity shall do all of the following:
(A) Provide public notice of the availability of work to be subcontracted in accordance with Section 10140 of the Public Contract Code.
(B) Provide a fixed date and time on which the subcontracted work will be awarded in accordance with Section 10141 of the Public Contract Code.
(C) As authorized by the Judicial Council, establish reasonable prequalification criteria and standards, limited in scope to those detailed in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c).
(D) Provide that the subcontracted work shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
(e) This section shall not be construed and is not intended to extend or limit the authority specified in Section 19130.
(f) Any design-build entity that is selected to design and construct a project pursuant to this section shall possess or obtain sufficient bonding consistent with applicable provisions of the Public Contract Code. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a general or engineering contractor from being designated the lead entity on a design-build entity for the purposes of purchasing necessary bonding to cover the activities of the design-build entity.
(g) Any payment or performance bond written for the purposes of this section shall use a bond form developed by the Judicial Council. In developing the bond form, the Judicial Council shall consult with the surety industry to achieve a bond form that is consistent with surety industry standards, while protecting the interests of the state.
(h) The Judicial Council shall submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, before January 1, 2014, a report containing a description of each public works project procured through the design-build process described in this section that is completed after January 1, 2009, and before December 1, 2013. The report shall include, but shall not be limited to, all of the following information:
(1) The type of project.
(2) The gross square footage of the project.
(3) The design-build entity that was awarded the project.
(4) The estimated and actual project costs.
(5) An assessment of the prequalification process and criteria.
(6) An assessment of the effect of any retention on the project made under the law.
(7) A description of the method used to award the contract. If the best value method was used, the report shall describe the factors used to evaluate the bid, including the weighting of each factor and an assessment of the effectiveness of the methodology.
(i) The authority under this section and Section 14661.1 shall apply to a total of not more than five state office facilities, prison facilities, or court facilities, which shall be determined pursuant to this subdivision.
(1) In order to enter into a contract utilizing the procurement method authorized under this section, the Judicial Council shall submit a request to the Department of Finance.
(2) The Department of Finance shall make a determination whether to approve or deny a request made pursuant to paragraph (1) if the design-build project requested will not exceed the five facilities maximum set forth in this section and Section 14661.1.
(3) After receiving notification that the Department of Finance has approved the request and that the Legislature has appropriated funds for a specific project, the Judicial Council may enter into a design-build contract under this section.
(j) Nothing in this section is intended to affect, expand, alter, or limit any rights or remedies otherwise available under the law.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of the Public Contract Code or any other law, when the Legislature appropriates funds for a specific project, the Judicial Council may contract and procure court facilities pursuant to this section.
(c) Prior to contracting with a design-build entity for the procurement of a court facility under this section, the Judicial Council shall:
(1) Prepare a program setting forth the performance criteria for the design-build project. The performance criteria shall be prepared by a design professional duly licensed and registered in the State of California.
(2) (A) Establish a competitive prequalification and selection process for design-build entities, including any subcontractors listed at the time of bid, that clearly specifies the prequalification criteria, and states the manner in which the winning design-build entity will be selected.
(B) Prequalification shall be limited to consideration of all of the following criteria:
(i) Possession of all required licenses, registration, and credentials in good standing that are required to design and construct the project.
(ii) Submission of evidence that establishes that the design-build entity members have completed, or demonstrated the capability to complete, projects of similar size, scope, or complexity, and that proposed key personnel have sufficient experience and training to competently manage and complete the design and construction of the project.
(iii) Submission of a proposed project management plan that establishes that the design-build entity has the experience, competence, and capacity needed to effectively complete the project.
(iv) Submission of evidence that establishes that the design-build entity has the capacity to obtain all required payment and performance bonding, liability insurance, and errors and omissions insurance, as well as a financial statement that assures the Judicial Council that the design-build entity has the capacity to complete the project.
(v) Provision of a declaration certifying that applying members of the design-build entity have not had a surety company finish work on any project within the last five years.
(vi) Provision of information and a declaration providing detail concerning all of the following:
(I) Any construction or design claim or litigation totaling more than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) or 5 percent of the annual value of work performed, whichever is less, settled against any member of the design-build entity over the last five years.
(II) Serious violations of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973, as provided in Part 1 (commencing with Section 6300) of Division 5 of the Labor Code, settled against any member of the design-build entity.
(III) Violations of federal or state law, including, but not limited to, those laws governing the payment of wages, benefits, or personal income tax withholding, or of Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) withholding requirements, state disability insurance withholding, or unemployment insurance payment requirements, settled against any member of the design-build entity over the last five years. For purposes of this subclause, only violations by a design-build member as an employer shall be deemed applicable, unless it is shown that the design-build entity member, in his or her capacity as an employer, had knowledge of his or her subcontractor's violations or failed to comply with the conditions set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 1775 of the Labor Code.
(IV) Information required by Section 10162 of the Public Contract Code.
(V) Violations of the Contractors' State License Law (Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), excluding alleged violations or complaints.
(VI) Any conviction of any member of the design-build entity of submitting a false or fraudulent claim to a public agency over the last five years.
(vii) Provision of a declaration that the design-build entity will comply with all other provisions of law applicable to the project, including, but not limited to, the requirements of Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code.
(C) The Judicial Council, when requested by the design-build entity, shall hold in confidence any information required by clauses (i) to (vi), inclusive, of subparagraph (B).
(D) Any declaration required under subparagraph (B) shall state that reasonable diligence has been used in its preparation and that it is true and complete to the best of the signer's knowledge. A person who certifies as true any material matter that he or she knows to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by not more than one year in a county jail, by a fine of not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both the fine and imprisonment.
(3) (A) Determine, as the Judicial Council deems in the best interests of the state, which of the following methods listed in subparagraph (B) will be used as the process for the winning design-build entity. The Judicial Council shall provide a notification to the State Public Works Board, regarding the method selected for determining the winning design-build entity, at least 30 days prior to publicizing the design-build solicitation package.
(B) The Judicial Council shall make its determination by choosing one of the following methods:
(i) A design-build competition based upon performance, price, and other criteria set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. The Judicial Council shall establish technical criteria and methodology, including price, to evaluate proposals and shall describe the criteria and methodology in the design-build solicitation package. Award shall be made to the design-build entity whose proposal is judged as providing the best value in meeting the interests of the Judicial Council and meeting the objectives of the project. A project with an approved budget of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more may be awarded pursuant to this clause.
(ii) A design-build competition based upon performance and other criteria set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. Criteria used in this evaluation of proposals may include, but need not be limited to, items such as proposed design approach, life-cycle costs, project features, and functions. However, any criteria and methods used to evaluate proposals shall be limited to those contained in the design-build solicitation package. Award shall be made to the design-build entity whose proposal is judged as providing the best value, for the lowest price, meeting the interests of the Judicial Council and meeting the objectives of the project. A project with an approved budget of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more may be awarded pursuant to this clause.
(iii) A design-build competition based upon program requirements and a detailed scope of work, including any performance criteria and concept drawings set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. Award shall be made on the basis of the lowest responsible bid. A project with an approved budget of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) or more may be awarded pursuant to this clause.
(4) For purposes of this subdivision, the following definitions shall apply:
(A) "Best interest of the state" means a design-build process that is projected by the Judicial Council to reduce the project delivery schedule and total cost of a project while maintaining a high level of quality workmanship and materials, when compared to the traditional design-bid-build process.
(B) "Best value" means a value determined by objective criteria that may include, but are not limited to, price, features, functions, life-cycle costs, experience, and other criteria deemed appropriate by the Judicial Council.
(d) The Legislature recognizes that the design-build entity is charged with performing both design and construction. Because a design-build contract may be awarded prior to the completion of the design, it is often impracticable for the design-build entity to list all subcontractors at the time of the award. As a result, the subcontractor listing requirements contained in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 4100) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code can create a conflict with the implementation of the design-build process by requiring all subcontractors to be listed at a time when a sufficient set of plans may not be available. It is the intent of the Legislature to establish a clear process for the selection and award of subcontracts entered into pursuant to this section in a manner that retains protection for subcontractors while enabling design-build projects to be administered in an efficient fashion. Therefore, all of the following requirements shall apply to subcontractors, licensed pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, that are employed on design-build projects undertaken pursuant to this section:
(1) The Judicial Council, in each design-build solicitation package, may identify types of subcontractors, by subcontractor license classification, that will be listed by the design-build entity at the time of the bid. In selecting the subcontractors that will be listed by the design-build entity, the Judicial Council shall limit the identification to only those license classifications deemed essential for proper completion of the project. In no event, however, may the Judicial Council specify more than five licensed subcontractor classifications. In addition, at its discretion, the design-build entity may list an additional two subcontractors, identified by subcontractor license classification, that will perform design or construction work, or both, on the project. In no event shall the design-build entity list at the time of bid a total number of subcontractors that will perform design or construction work, or both, in a total of more than seven subcontractor license classifications on a project. All subcontractors that are listed at the time of bid shall be afforded all of the protection contained in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 4100) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code. All subcontracts that were not listed by the design-build entity at the time of bid shall be awarded in accordance with paragraph (2).
(2) All subcontracts that were not to be performed by the design-build entity in accordance with paragraph (1) shall be competitively bid and awarded by the design-build entity, in accordance with the design-build process set forth by the Judicial Council in the design-build solicitation package. The design-build entity shall do all of the following:
(A) Provide public notice of the availability of work to be subcontracted in accordance with Section 10140 of the Public Contract Code.
(B) Provide a fixed date and time on which the subcontracted work will be awarded in accordance with Section 10141 of the Public Contract Code.
(C) As authorized by the Judicial Council, establish reasonable prequalification criteria and standards, limited in scope to those detailed in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c).
(D) Provide that the subcontracted work shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
(e) This section shall not be construed and is not intended to extend or limit the authority specified in Section 19130.
(f) Any design-build entity that is selected to design and construct a project pursuant to this section shall possess or obtain sufficient bonding consistent with applicable provisions of the Public Contract Code. Nothing in this section shall prohibit a general or engineering contractor from being designated the lead entity on a design-build entity for the purposes of purchasing necessary bonding to cover the activities of the design-build entity.
(g) Any payment or performance bond written for the purposes of this section shall use a bond form developed by the Judicial Council. In developing the bond form, the Judicial Council shall consult with the surety industry to achieve a bond form that is consistent with surety industry standards, while protecting the interests of the state.
(h) The Judicial Council shall submit to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, before January 1, 2014, a report containing a description of each public works project procured through the design-build process described in this section that is completed after January 1, 2009, and before December 1, 2013. The report shall include, but shall not be limited to, all of the following information:
(1) The type of project.
(2) The gross square footage of the project.
(3) The design-build entity that was awarded the project.
(4) The estimated and actual project costs.
(5) An assessment of the prequalification process and criteria.
(6) An assessment of the effect of any retention on the project made under the law.
(7) A description of the method used to award the contract. If the best value method was used, the report shall describe the factors used to evaluate the bid, including the weighting of each factor and an assessment of the effectiveness of the methodology.
(i) The authority under this section and Section 14661.1 shall apply to a total of not more than five state office facilities, prison facilities, or court facilities, which shall be determined pursuant to this subdivision.
(1) In order to enter into a contract utilizing the procurement method authorized under this section, the Judicial Council shall submit a request to the Department of Finance.
(2) The Department of Finance shall make a determination whether to approve or deny a request made pursuant to paragraph (1) if the design-build project requested will not exceed the five facilities maximum set forth in this section and Section 14661.1.
(3) After receiving notification that the Department of Finance has approved the request and that the Legislature has appropriated funds for a specific project, the Judicial Council may enter into a design-build contract under this section.
(j) Nothing in this section is intended to affect, expand, alter, or limit any rights or remedies otherwise available under the law.
Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, the
Administrative Office of the Courts shall have the following
responsibilities and authority in addition to other responsibilities
and authority granted by law or delegated by the Judicial Council:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to the appropriation of funds, provide the ongoing oversight, management, operation, and maintenance of facilities used by the trial courts, if the responsibility for the facility has been transferred to the Judicial Council pursuant to this chapter.
(b) Carry out the Judicial Council's policies with regard to trial court facilities, except as otherwise expressly limited by law.
(c) Develop for Judicial Council approval the master plans for trial court facilities in each district.
(d) Construction of court buildings, including, but not limited to, selection of architects and contractors, except as otherwise expressly limited by law.
(e) Delegate its responsibilities and authority to the local trial court for court facilities used by that court.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to the appropriation of funds, provide the ongoing oversight, management, operation, and maintenance of facilities used by the trial courts, if the responsibility for the facility has been transferred to the Judicial Council pursuant to this chapter.
(b) Carry out the Judicial Council's policies with regard to trial court facilities, except as otherwise expressly limited by law.
(c) Develop for Judicial Council approval the master plans for trial court facilities in each district.
(d) Construction of court buildings, including, but not limited to, selection of architects and contractors, except as otherwise expressly limited by law.
(e) Delegate its responsibilities and authority to the local trial court for court facilities used by that court.
The county shall have the following authority and
responsibilities with regard to court facilities in addition to any
other authority or responsibilities established by law:
(a) Manage the shared-use buildings whose title the county retains under subdivision (b) of Section 70323.
(b) Make recommendations to the court and the Judicial Council for the location of new court facilities.
(c) Provide services to local court facilities as provided in the agreement entered into under Section 70322.
(d) Indemnify the state for any liability imposed on the state pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq.), or related provisions for conditions that existed on the property at the time of transfer whether or not known to the county.
(a) Manage the shared-use buildings whose title the county retains under subdivision (b) of Section 70323.
(b) Make recommendations to the court and the Judicial Council for the location of new court facilities.
(c) Provide services to local court facilities as provided in the agreement entered into under Section 70322.
(d) Indemnify the state for any liability imposed on the state pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq.), or related provisions for conditions that existed on the property at the time of transfer whether or not known to the county.
(a) The Judicial Council shall establish a task force on
county law libraries. The task force is charged with identifying the
needs related to county law library operations and facilities, and
identifying and making recommendations for funding county law library
operations, facility improvements, and expansion.
(b) The task force shall consist of three representatives from the judicial branch of government, as selected by the Administrative Director of the Courts, three representatives of the counties, as selected by the California State Association of Counties, and three county law library administrators, as selected by the Council of California County Law Librarians. The Administrative Director of the Courts shall designate one of these representatives as chairperson of the task force.
(c) The Administrative Office of the Courts shall provide staff support for the task force and shall develop guidelines for procedures and practices for the task force.
(d) The duties of the task force shall include all of the following:
(1) Review the state of existing county law libraries.
(2) Examine existing standards for county law library operations.
(3) Document the funding mechanisms currently available for the maintenance and operation of county law library facilities.
(4) Recommend funding sources and financing mechanisms for support of county law library operations and facility maintenance.
(e) The task force shall be appointed on or before March 1, 2004. The task force shall submit its report and recommendations to the Judicial Council and the Legislature on or before January 1, 2005.
(f) The Judicial Council shall implement this section using existing resources. Any costs for counties and county law librarians to assist in the implementation of this section shall be at county or county law librarians' expense, respectively.
(b) The task force shall consist of three representatives from the judicial branch of government, as selected by the Administrative Director of the Courts, three representatives of the counties, as selected by the California State Association of Counties, and three county law library administrators, as selected by the Council of California County Law Librarians. The Administrative Director of the Courts shall designate one of these representatives as chairperson of the task force.
(c) The Administrative Office of the Courts shall provide staff support for the task force and shall develop guidelines for procedures and practices for the task force.
(d) The duties of the task force shall include all of the following:
(1) Review the state of existing county law libraries.
(2) Examine existing standards for county law library operations.
(3) Document the funding mechanisms currently available for the maintenance and operation of county law library facilities.
(4) Recommend funding sources and financing mechanisms for support of county law library operations and facility maintenance.
(e) The task force shall be appointed on or before March 1, 2004. The task force shall submit its report and recommendations to the Judicial Council and the Legislature on or before January 1, 2005.
(f) The Judicial Council shall implement this section using existing resources. Any costs for counties and county law librarians to assist in the implementation of this section shall be at county or county law librarians' expense, respectively.
