Article 2. Determination Of Medical Issues of California Labor Code >> Division 4. >> Part 1. >> Chapter 7. >> Article 2.
(a) This section shall apply to disputes over the
compensability of any injury. This section shall not apply where
injury to any part or parts of the body is accepted as compensable by
the employer.
(b) Neither the employer nor the employee shall be liable for any
comprehensive medical-legal evaluation performed by other than the
treating physician, except as provided in this section. However,
reports of treating physicians shall be admissible.
(c) If a medical evaluation is required to determine
compensability at any time after the filing of the claim form, and
the employee is represented by an attorney, a medical evaluation to
determine compensability shall be obtained only by the procedure
provided in Section 4062.2.
(d) If a medical evaluation is required to determine
compensability at any time after the claim form is filed, and the
employee is not represented by an attorney, the employer shall
provide the employee with notice either that the employer requests a
comprehensive medical evaluation to determine compensability or that
the employer has not accepted liability and the employee may request
a comprehensive medical evaluation to determine compensability.
Either party may request a comprehensive medical evaluation to
determine compensability. The evaluation shall be obtained only by
the procedure provided in Section 4062.1.
(e) The notice required by subdivision (d) shall be accompanied by
the form prescribed by the administrative director for requesting
the assignment of a panel of qualified medical evaluators.
This section shall not apply to the employee's dispute of a
utilization review decision under Section 4610, nor to the employee's
dispute of the medical provider network treating physician's
diagnosis or treatment recommendations under Sections 4616.3 and
4616.4.
(a) Together with the last payment of temporary disability
indemnity, the employer shall, in a form prescribed by the
administrative director pursuant to Section 138.4, provide the
employee one of the following:
(1) Notice either that no permanent disability indemnity will be
paid because the employer alleges the employee has no permanent
impairment or limitations resulting from the injury or notice of the
amount of permanent disability indemnity determined by the employer
to be payable. If the employer determines permanent disability
indemnity is payable, the employer shall advise the employee of the
amount determined payable and the basis on which the determination
was made, whether there is need for future medical care, and whether
an indemnity payment will be deferred pursuant to paragraph (2) of
subdivision (b) of Section 4650.
(2) Notice that permanent disability indemnity may be or is
payable, but that the amount cannot be determined because the
employee's medical condition is not yet permanent and stationary. The
notice shall advise the employee that his or her medical condition
will be monitored until it is permanent and stationary, at which time
the necessary evaluation will be performed to determine the
existence and extent of permanent impairment and limitations for the
purpose of rating permanent disability and to determine whether there
will be the need for future medical care, or at which time the
employer will advise the employee of the amount of permanent
disability indemnity the employer has determined to be payable.
(b) If either the employee or employer objects to a medical
determination made by the treating physician concerning the existence
or extent of permanent impairment and limitations or the need for
future medical care, and the employee is represented by an attorney,
a medical evaluation to determine permanent disability shall be
obtained as provided in Section 4062.2.
(c) If either the employee or employer objects to a medical
determination made by the treating physician concerning the existence
or extent of permanent impairment and limitations or the need for
future medical care, and if the employee is not represented by an
attorney, the employer shall immediately provide the employee with a
form prescribed by the medical director with which to request
assignment of a panel of three qualified medical evaluators. Either
party may request a comprehensive medical evaluation to determine
permanent disability or the need for future medical care, and the
evaluation shall be obtained only by the procedure provided in
Section 4062.1.
(d) (1) Within 30 days of receipt of a report from a qualified
medical evaluator who has evaluated an unrepresented employee, the
unrepresented employee or the employer may each request one
supplemental report seeking correction of factual errors in the
report. Any of these requests shall be made in writing. A request
made by the employer shall be provided to the employee, and a request
made by the employee shall be provided to the employer, insurance
carrier, or claims administrator at the time the request is sent to
the evaluator. A request for correction that is made by the employer
shall also inform the employee of the availability of information and
assistance officers to assist him or her in responding to the
request, if necessary.
(2) The permanent disability rating procedure set forth in
subdivision (e) shall not be invoked by the unrepresented employee or
the employer when a request for correction pursuant to paragraph (1)
is pending.
(e) The qualified medical evaluator who has evaluated an
unrepresented employee shall serve the comprehensive medical
evaluation and the summary form on the employee, employer, and the
administrative director. The unrepresented employee or the employer
may submit the treating physician's evaluation for the calculation of
a permanent disability rating. Within 20 days of receipt of the
comprehensive medical evaluation, the administrative director shall
calculate the permanent disability rating according to Section 4660
or 4660.1, as applicable, and serve the rating on the employee and
employer.
(f) Any comprehensive medical evaluation concerning an
unrepresented employee which indicates that part or all of an
employee's permanent impairment or limitations may be subject to
apportionment pursuant to Sections 4663 and 4664 shall first be
submitted by the administrative director to a workers' compensation
judge who may refer the report back to the qualified medical
evaluator for correction or clarification if the judge determines the
proposed apportionment is inconsistent with the law.
(g) Within 30 days of receipt of the rating, if the employee is
unrepresented, the employee or employer may request that the
administrative director reconsider the recommended rating or obtain
additional information from the treating physician or medical
evaluator to address issues not addressed or not completely addressed
in the original comprehensive medical evaluation or not prepared in
accord with the procedures promulgated under paragraph (2) or (3) of
subdivision (j) of Section 139.2. This request shall be in writing,
shall specify the reasons the rating should be reconsidered, and
shall be served on the other party. If the administrative director
finds the comprehensive medical evaluation is not complete or not in
compliance with the required procedures, the administrative director
shall return the report to the treating physician or qualified
medical evaluator for appropriate action as the administrative
director instructs. Upon receipt of the treating physician's or
qualified medical evaluator's final comprehensive medical evaluation
and summary form, the administrative director shall recalculate the
permanent disability rating according to Section 4660 or 4660.1, as
applicable, and serve the rating, the comprehensive medical
evaluation, and the summary form on the employee and employer.
(h) (1) If a comprehensive medical evaluation from the treating
physician or an agreed medical evaluator or a qualified medical
evaluator selected from a three-member panel resolves any issue so as
to require an employer to provide compensation, the employer shall
commence the payment of compensation, except as provided pursuant to
paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 4650, or promptly
commence proceedings before the appeals board to resolve the dispute.
(2) If the employee and employer agree to a stipulated findings
and award as provided under Section 5702 or to compromise and release
the claim under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 5000) of Part 3,
or if the employee wishes to commute the award under Chapter 3
(commencing with Section 5100) of Part 3, the appeals board shall
first determine whether the agreement or commutation is in the best
interests of the employee and whether the proper procedures have been
followed in determining the permanent disability rating. The
administrative director shall promulgate a form to notify the
employee, at the time of service of any rating under this section, of
the options specified in this subdivision, the potential advantages
and disadvantages of each option, and the procedure for disputing the
rating.
(i) No issue relating to a dispute over the existence or extent of
permanent impairment and limitations resulting from the injury may
be the subject of a declaration of readiness to proceed unless there
has first been a medical evaluation by a treating physician and by
either an agreed or qualified medical evaluator. With the exception
of an evaluation or evaluations prepared by the treating physician or
physicians, no evaluation of permanent impairment and limitations
resulting from the injury shall be obtained, except in accordance
with Section 4062.1 or 4062.2. Evaluations obtained in violation of
this prohibition shall not be admissible in any proceeding before the
appeals board.
The treating physician primarily responsible for managing
the care of the injured worker or the physician designated by that
treating physician shall, in accordance with rules promulgated by the
administrative director, render opinions on all medical issues
necessary to determine eligibility for compensation. In the event
that there is more than one treating physician, a single report shall
be prepared by the physician primarily responsible for managing the
injured worker's care that incorporates the findings of the various
treating physicians.
(a) If either the employee or employer objects to a medical
determination made by the treating physician concerning any medical
issues not covered by Section 4060 or 4061 and not subject to Section
4610, the objecting party shall notify the other party in writing of
the objection within 20 days of receipt of the report if the
employee is represented by an attorney or within 30 days of receipt
of the report if the employee is not represented by an attorney.
These time limits may be extended for good cause or by mutual
agreement. If the employee is represented by an attorney, a medical
evaluation to determine the disputed medical issue shall be obtained
as provided in Section 4062.2, and no other medical evaluation shall
be obtained. If the employee is not represented by an attorney, the
employer shall immediately provide the employee with a form
prescribed by the medical director with which to request assignment
of a panel of three qualified medical evaluators, the evaluation
shall be obtained as provided in Section 4062.1, and no other medical
evaluation shall be obtained.
(b) If the employee objects to a decision made pursuant to Section
4610 to modify, delay, or deny a request for authorization of a
medical treatment recommendation made by a treating physician, the
objection shall be resolved only in accordance with the independent
medical review process established in Section 4610.5.
(c) If the employee objects to the diagnosis or recommendation for
medical treatment by a physician within the employer's medical
provider network established pursuant to Section 4616, the objection
shall be resolved only in accordance with the independent medical
review process established in Sections 4616.3 and 4616.4.
(a) If an employee is not represented by an attorney, the
employer shall not seek agreement with the employee on an agreed
medical evaluator, nor shall an agreed medical evaluator prepare the
formal medical evaluation on any issues in dispute.
(b) If either party requests a medical evaluation pursuant to
Section 4060, 4061, or 4062, either party may submit the form
prescribed by the administrative director requesting the medical
director to assign a panel of three qualified medical evaluators in
accordance with Section 139.2. However, the employer may not submit
the form unless the employee has not submitted the form within 10
days after the employer has furnished the form to the employee and
requested the employee to submit the form. The party submitting the
request form shall designate the specialty of the physicians that
will be assigned to the panel.
(c) Within 10 days of the issuance of a panel of qualified medical
evaluators, the employee shall select a physician from the panel to
prepare a medical evaluation, the employee shall schedule the
appointment, and the employee shall inform the employer of the
selection and the appointment. If the employee does not inform the
employer of the selection within 10 days of the assignment of a panel
of qualified medical evaluators, then the employer may select the
physician from the panel to prepare a medical evaluation. If the
employee informs the employer of the selection within 10 days of the
assignment of the panel but has not made the appointment, or if the
employer selects the physician pursuant to this subdivision, then the
employer shall arrange the appointment. Upon receipt of written
notice of the appointment arrangements from the employee, or upon
giving the employee notice of an appointment arranged by the
employer, the employer shall furnish payment of estimated travel
expense.
(d) The evaluator shall give the employee, at the appointment, a
brief opportunity to ask questions concerning the evaluation process
and the evaluator's background. The unrepresented employee shall then
participate in the evaluation as requested by the evaluator unless
the employee has good cause to discontinue the evaluation. For
purposes of this subdivision, "good cause" shall include evidence
that the evaluator is biased against the employee because of his or
her race, sex, national origin, religion, or sexual preference or
evidence that the evaluator has requested the employee to submit to
an unnecessary medical examination or procedure. If the unrepresented
employee declines to proceed with the evaluation, he or she shall
have the right to a new panel of three qualified medical evaluators
from which to select one to prepare a comprehensive medical
evaluation. If the appeals board subsequently determines that the
employee did not have good cause to not proceed with the evaluation,
the cost of the evaluation shall be deducted from any award the
employee obtains.
(e) If an employee has received a comprehensive medical-legal
evaluation under this section, and he or she later becomes
represented by an attorney, he or she shall not be entitled to an
additional evaluation.
(a) Whenever a comprehensive medical evaluation is required
to resolve any dispute arising out of an injury or a claimed injury
occurring on or after January 1, 2005, and the employee is
represented by an attorney, the evaluation shall be obtained only as
provided in this section.
(b) No earlier than the first working day that is at least 10 days
after the date of mailing of a request for a medical evaluation
pursuant to Section 4060 or the first working day that is at least 10
days after the date of mailing of an objection pursuant to Sections
4061 or 4062, either party may request the assignment of a
three-member panel of qualified medical evaluators to conduct a
comprehensive medical evaluation. The party submitting the request
shall designate the specialty of the medical evaluator, the specialty
of the medical evaluator requested by the other party if it has been
made known to the party submitting the request, and the specialty of
the treating physician. The party submitting the request form shall
serve a copy of the request form on the other party.
(c) Within 10 days of assignment of the panel by the
administrative director, each party may strike one name from the
panel. The remaining qualified medical evaluator shall serve as the
medical evaluator. If a party fails to exercise the right to strike a
name from the panel within 10 days of assignment of the panel by the
administrative director, the other party may select any physician
who remains on the panel to serve as the medical evaluator. The
administrative director may prescribe the form, the manner, or both,
by which the parties shall conduct the selection process.
(d) The represented employee shall be responsible for arranging
the appointment for the examination, but upon his or her failure to
inform the employer of the appointment within 10 days after the
medical evaluator has been selected, the employer may arrange the
appointment and notify the employee of the arrangements. The employee
shall not unreasonably refuse to participate in the evaluation.
(e) If an employee has received a comprehensive medical-legal
evaluation under this section, and he or she later ceases to be
represented, he or she shall not be entitled to an additional
evaluation.
(f) The parties may agree to an agreed medical evaluator at any
time, except as to issues subject to the independent medical review
process established pursuant to Section 4610.5. A panel shall not be
requested pursuant to subdivision (b) on any issue that has been
agreed to be submitted to or has been submitted to an agreed medical
evaluator unless the agreement has been canceled by mutual written
consent.
(a) Any party may provide to the qualified medical
evaluator selected from a panel any of the following information:
(1) Records prepared or maintained by the employee's treating
physician or physicians.
(2) Medical and nonmedical records relevant to determination of
the medical issue.
(b) Information that a party proposes to provide to the qualified
medical evaluator selected from a panel shall be served on the
opposing party 20 days before the information is provided to the
evaluator. If the opposing party objects to consideration of
nonmedical records within 10 days thereafter, the records shall not
be provided to the evaluator. Either party may use discovery to
establish the accuracy or authenticity of nonmedical records prior to
the evaluation.
(c) If an agreed medical evaluator is selected, as part of their
agreement on an evaluator, the parties shall agree on what
information is to be provided to the agreed medical evaluator.
(d) In any formal medical evaluation, the agreed or qualified
medical evaluator shall identify the following:
(1) All information received from the parties.
(2) All information reviewed in preparation of the report.
(3) All information relied upon in the formulation of his or her
opinion.
(e) All communications with a qualified medical evaluator selected
from a panel before a medical evaluation shall be in writing and
shall be served on the opposing party 20 days in advance of the
evaluation. Any subsequent communication with the medical evaluator
shall be in writing and shall be served on the opposing party when
sent to the medical evaluator.
(f) Communications with an agreed medical evaluator shall be in
writing, and shall be served on the opposing party when sent to the
agreed medical evaluator. Oral or written communications with
physician staff or, as applicable, with the agreed medical evaluator,
relative to nonsubstantial matters such as the scheduling of
appointments, missed appointments, the furnishing of records and
reports, and the availability of the report, do not constitute ex
parte communication in violation of this section unless the appeals
board has made a specific finding of an impermissible ex parte
communication.
(g) Ex parte communication with an agreed medical evaluator or a
qualified medical evaluator selected from a panel is prohibited. If a
party communicates with the agreed medical evaluator or the
qualified medical evaluator in violation of subdivision (e), the
aggrieved party may elect to terminate the medical evaluation and
seek a new evaluation from another qualified medical evaluator to be
selected according to Section 4062.1 or 4062.2, as applicable, or
proceed with the initial evaluation.
(h) The party making the communication prohibited by this section
shall be subject to being charged with contempt before the appeals
board and shall be liable for the costs incurred by the aggrieved
party as a result of the prohibited communication, including the cost
of the medical evaluation, additional discovery costs, and attorney'
s fees for related discovery.
(i) Subdivisions (e) and (g) shall not apply to oral or written
communications by the employee or, if the employee is deceased, the
employee's dependent, in the course of the examination or at the
request of the evaluator in connection with the examination.
(j) Upon completing a determination of the disputed medical issue,
the medical evaluator shall summarize the medical findings on a form
prescribed by the administrative director and shall serve the formal
medical evaluation and the summary form on the employee and the
employer. The medical evaluation shall address all contested medical
issues arising from all injuries reported on one or more claim forms
prior to the date of the employee's initial appointment with the
medical evaluator.
(k) If, after a medical evaluation is prepared, the employer or
the employee subsequently objects to any new medical issue, the
parties, to the extent possible, shall utilize the same medical
evaluator who prepared the previous evaluation to resolve the medical
dispute.
(l) No disputed medical issue specified in subdivision (a) may be
the subject of declaration of readiness to proceed unless there has
first been an evaluation by the treating physician or an agreed or
qualified medical evaluator.
If a qualified medical evaluator selected from a panel
fails to complete the formal medical evaluation within the timeframes
established by the administrative director pursuant to paragraph (1)
of subdivision (j) of Section 139.2, a new evaluation may be
obtained upon the request of either party, as provided in Sections
4062.1 or 4062.2. Neither the employee nor the employer shall have
any liability for payment for the formal medical evaluation which was
not completed within the required timeframes unless the employee or
employer, on forms prescribed by the administrative director, each
waive the right to a new evaluation and elects to accept the original
evaluation even though it was not completed within the required
timeframes.
The administrative director shall develop, not later than
January 1, 2004, and periodically revise as necessary thereafter,
educational materials to be used to provide treating physicians, as
described in Section 3209.3, or other providers, as described in
Section 3209.5, with information and training in basic concepts of
workers' compensation, the role of the treating physician, the
conduct of permanent and stationary evaluations, and report writing,
as appropriate.
If a formal medical evaluation from an agreed medical
evaluator or a qualified medical evaluator selected from a three
member panel resolves any issue so as to require an employer to
provide compensation, the employer shall, except as provided pursuant
to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 4650, commence the
payment of compensation or file a declaration of readiness to
proceed.
(a) The employer shall be liable for the cost of each
reasonable and necessary comprehensive medical-legal evaluation
obtained by the employee pursuant to Sections 4060, 4061, and 4062.
Each comprehensive medical-legal evaluation shall address all
contested medical issues arising from all injuries reported on one or
more claim forms, except medical treatment recommendations, which
are subject to utilization review as provided by Section 4610, and
objections to utilization review determinations, which are subject to
independent medical review as provided by Section 4610.5.
(b) For injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2003, if an
unrepresented employee obtains an attorney after the evaluation
pursuant to subdivision (d) of Section 4061 or subdivision (b) of
Section 4062 has been completed, the employee shall be entitled to
the same reports at employer expense as an employee who has been
represented from the time the dispute arose and those reports shall
be admissible in any proceeding before the appeals board.
(c) Subject to Section 4906, if an employer files a declaration of
readiness to proceed and the employee is unrepresented at the time
the declaration of readiness to proceed is filed, the employer shall
be liable for any attorney's fees incurred by the employee in
connection with the declaration of readiness to proceed.
(d) The employer shall not be liable for the cost of any
comprehensive medical evaluations obtained by the employee other than
those authorized pursuant to Sections 4060, 4061, and 4062. However,
no party is prohibited from obtaining any medical evaluation or
consultation at the party's own expense. In no event shall an
employer or employee be liable for an evaluation obtained in
violation of subdivision (b) of Section 4060. All comprehensive
medical evaluations obtained by any party shall be admissible in any
proceeding before the appeals board except as provided in Section
4060, 4061, 4062, 4062.1, or 4062.2.
If the jurisdiction of the appeals board is invoked pursuant
to Section 5803 upon the grounds that the effects of the injury have
recurred, increased, diminished, or terminated, a formal medical
evaluation shall be obtained pursuant to this article.
When an agreed medical evaluator or a qualified medical evaluator
selected by an unrepresented employee from a three-member panel has
previously made a formal medical evaluation of the same or similar
issues, the subsequent or additional formal medical evaluation shall
be conducted by the same agreed medical evaluator or qualified
medical evaluator, unless the workers' compensation judge has made a
finding that he or she did not rely on the prior evaluator's formal
medical evaluation, any party contested the original medical
evaluation by filing an application for adjudication, the
unrepresented employee hired an attorney and selected a qualified
medical evaluator to conduct another evaluation pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 4064, or the prior evaluator is no longer
qualified or readily available to prepare a formal medical
evaluation, in which case Sections 4061 or 4062, as the case may be,
shall apply as if there had been no prior formal medical evaluation.
This article shall become operative for injuries occurring
on and after January 1, 1991.
(a) Upon determining that a treating physician's report
contains opinions that are the result of conjecture, are not
supported by adequate evidence, or that indicate bias, the appeals
board shall so notify the administrative director in writing in a
manner he or she has specified.
(b) If the administrative director believes that any treating
physician's reports show a pattern of unsupported opinions, he or she
shall notify in writing the physician's applicable licensing body of
his or her findings.