Article 2. Planning of California Streets And Highways Code >> Division 16. >> Part 3. >> Chapter 18. >> Article 2.
The Legislature finds and declares that since July 1, 1971,
the district has been freed of bonded indebtedness. The prospective
continuing role of the district and its responsibilities in the field
of transportation are policy questions of major importance to the
citizens of California, the people and communities regularly served
by the Golden Gate Bridge, the district, and the Legislature.
It is desirable, therefore, that all concerned have a common basis
for considering the issues and exercising judgment. To this end, the
district is directed to develop a transportation facilities plan.
The transportation facilities plan shall include, but not be
limited to, the following:
(a) A definition of the district's future responsibilities for
providing transportation services. Alternative proposals are
encouraged. Abolishment of the district should be one alternative, in
which case recommendations should be made for necessary transfer of
powers and duties.
(b) A priority schedule for assuming each of any proposed added
responsibilities.
(c) Necessary changes in the district's organizational structure
in order to be responsive to any changed responsibilities.
(d) An estimate of the expenditures that may be necessary to
support any added responsibilities.
(e) A definition of any capital improvements that may be required.
(f) A long-range estimate of bridge revenues, operating costs, and
net revenues that may be available as required to provide proposed
transportation services.
(g) A special element addressed to the interfacing of
transportation modes.
(h) Explicit consideration must be given to the environmental and
social values of the communities affected.
In developing the transportation facilities plan, the
district shall hold public hearings so that interested persons and
organizations are provided an opportunity to express their
viewpoints.
No long-range transportation plan of the district shall be
adopted unless such plan is consistent with the regional
transportation plan of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and
approved by the commission.